Is it communism or just a television series?
What
really attracts your attention while watching " La Casa de Papel "
series, is the plot of the story in which the means of production are
controlled by thieves. This time, the change wasn't the goal for them as
always seen in other movies or series, this time the case is totally
different. The goal is to enter the Royal Mint of Spain so they can
control the production and print the amount of money they want.
In
the first episodes you feel like you're reading a book that is written
by Karl Marx. However, this time the thieves were responsible for the
riots they made not the laborers. It wasn't an act of robbery; because
robbery is taking what is owned by someone. In this case, it was the act
of controlling on the properties and a full change on the production
means. In the point of view of Marx; this property was the main reason
for the misery the workers are living in. So, is it an intended message from the scenarist and the director or something way different?!
Arturo
Roman, the manager of the Royal Mint of Spain; he was described as any
other bourgeois who doesn't hesitate to be used by the Capitalism
against laborers. His character was represented as disingenuous, liar,
selfish, and narcissist. Whatever the role he plays, you don't really
notice any difference in his character, whether his role as a manager,
disloyal husband or kidnapped. He is greedy, ha always wants to be paid
for effortlessly. So you see him in the beginning of the series, rousing
people against the kidnappers, to play the role of a commander without
taking the responsibility into consideration.
So, his relation with the kidnappers is not the relation that is
between the criminal and the victim but it is kind of opposite
resistance.
In
a matter of minutes, the case was totally different. He lost his
authority and became without any control over anything. As a communist,
let me confess; that the scene when he was digging the trench and that
all his efforts went in vain after all, is a scene I would give my life
away just to watch it all over again.
On
the one hand, you see the quite, the diligent worker. Who would
participate with his kidnappers just to hit the record in production. In
one of the scenes; Nairobi made him choose between his freedom and the
two million dollars. Happily without any hesitation he chose the two
million dollars, thanking her, saying that she is the best boss ever. He
is so satisfied because he already knows that the Historical
Inevitability is something hard to stand against as a simple worker.
Isn't this the Historical Materialism? He chose money over his freedom
because he is sure that in a capitalistic society there is no freedom
without money, so your freedom is defined by your bank account. He didn't show any kind of resistance against the manager, because simply, he doesn't have anything to lose but his chains.
On
the other hand, there is Moscu the drudging worker, who started his
life working really hard in mines. As a result, he got sick and
the Capitalism disowned and threw his in streets as a mad dog. After
all, he mastered criminality as a mean to gain money, he couldn't
provide the good life for his son Denver, so the last became a criminal
exactly like his father.
It
is Communism, because El Profesor didn't see it as a robbery and his
goal wasn't the money. He considers it as a resistance against the
Economical and the Financial System. While he was narrating the rampage
which the Spanish made as an act of protesting; he spotted the light on
the revolutionary side, specially at the end and exactly in the 13
episode, in which the screen is totally Red. The color of
revolutionaries and blood, so you recall Lenin, Mao, Stalin and the
Spanish Anarchists, seeing Wall Street on the screen and those who
agiotage. And then you see hundreds of people and workers protesting
holding signs saying " We're suffering from Unemployment". Then, a woman
appears holding a sign saying "We want Bread" the sign that was held by
Lenin against the Russian Government, all of this is happening while
playing " Bella Ciao ". The
song that is well-known between the communist revolutionaries and the
anarchists. The Italian resistance song against the Fascism. Which later
was known around the world. It is not a coincidence that the same song
in on my cell phone for two years. What about Salvador Dali's Mask?
While going from the good kidnappers to the lunatics they put on the
mask! So why did they choose Dali? Personally speaking, I think that's
because he was Fascist, justifies Franco's crimes. Unlike Picasso, he
was supporting the Royalism and hates the revolutionaries. This mask
represent the Fascist side in every one of us. The director made a great
job in choosing the cast, the roles, and even the accessories,
everything is highly studied, it's like El Profesor is the one who
directed the movie. So, is it Communism? Or is it the History of Spain
that can't be divided from its Artistic side !!

Comments
Post a Comment